A “due on sale” clause allows lenders to foreclose on loans if property ownership is transferred without their approval. But in today’s market environment, with record numbers of foreclosures already in process, it is essential that homeowners have the ability to transfer their loans to individuals or investor groups who are in a stronger financial position, Norris said. Otherwise, additional properties will go into foreclosure, exacerbating lender losses while further undermining
“To have any chance of averting a record number of foreclosures,” Norris said, “government agencies and the real estate industry at large must act quickly to avoid lenders taking back this huge glut of foreclosure homes. They also must work even harder to create a new pool of capable buyers to absorb the increasing inventory surplus. Suspending due on sale clauses would allow this to happen.”
Lenders can also provide immediate market relief by allowing ownership to be transferred on properties currently in the foreclosure process.
“By temporarily suspending ‘due on sale’ clauses,” Norris said, “lenders will be in a safer position because the new buyer will most likely have more money into the deal than the original borrower. Having ‘skin in the game’ is the best insurance policy a lender can hope for at this point. The lender will also avoid taking back another property and continue to lose even more money.”
Norris also warned that if lenders continue to embrace “due on sale” provisions, more than 100,000
“When you combine all the short sales and lender-owned properties in 2008, combined they will represent one of every three sales in the state!,” Norris said. “This will create further price damage and involve the owners who once thought they had a safe margin of equity as well as the lenders who made loans to prime borrowers. The lenders will then begin the foreclosure process on a new batch of shocked and dismayed homeowners.”